<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Google Translate&#8217;s latest update enables offline languages	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://appslova.com/google-translates-latest-update-enables-offline-languages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://appslova.com/google-translates-latest-update-enables-offline-languages/</link>
	<description>News reviews &#38; fixes for Smart devices and apps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 05:11:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Merle Piechoski		</title>
		<link>https://appslova.com/google-translates-latest-update-enables-offline-languages/#comment-18</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Merle Piechoski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 01:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://appslova.com/?p=699#comment-18</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Web based translation have come a long way since the time they first appeared. At the very beginning, they would just translate text word by word, not regard any other aspects, this result in the translated text practically useless. Much of that has been changed with the emergence of the Google translation. It can now hand in pretty good translations of websites. But the web based translations still have some limitations. How should we decide whether we shall do the translation on the web or get a human translator involved? ..:

Be well
http://melatoninfaq.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web based translation have come a long way since the time they first appeared. At the very beginning, they would just translate text word by word, not regard any other aspects, this result in the translated text practically useless. Much of that has been changed with the emergence of the Google translation. It can now hand in pretty good translations of websites. But the web based translations still have some limitations. How should we decide whether we shall do the translation on the web or get a human translator involved? ..:</p>
<p>Be well<br />
<a href="http://melatoninfaq.com" rel="nofollow ugc">http://melatoninfaq.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
